There is quite a hot debate going on behind whether remote workers are more productive or in-house workers?
Yes, this is the biggest and hottest topic among industries right now. The most important point to keep in mind is that what gives you more result-oriented results? Results are the most optimum factor to determine the direction of your goals.
According to research, it has been noted that the maximum productive results are observed by remote employees as compared to in-house employees. But what factors are kept in mind while performing this research is another important aspect. The agenda for this research includes factors like performance, productivity, sick leaves, engagement, satisfaction with the job, cost-effectiveness, etc.
Here I am sharing few methods which prove that the remote workers are definitely more productive than the in-house workers. Read the following points and get detailed information on this topic. Few of them I have shared below:
Let us see how remote workers are more productive than in-house.
Performance
When you work remotely, your performance increases effectively due to a comfortable work environment and certainly the pleasures you enjoy while working from home. You are more concentrated towards your work as you are in a more comfortable environment. According to research, 61% agrees that loud colleagues are the biggest office distraction. Also, 80% of people prefer to work alone to hit maximum productivity. Remote workers are experienced more with high performance.
Productivity
Productivity is what attained by best performance. If you perform well, ultimately you produce well. To increase productivity, you need to improve performance. 65% of people reported that working from home is more productive for them rather than working in the office and even 64% of employees would sacrifice pay to work from home. This shows that the telecommuters themselves notice the difference.
Sick Leaves
Remote workers take fewer days off as compared to in-house workers. The reason behind this can be highlighted as telecommuting. As remote workers can even work when the health condition is not good since they are at their own comfortable place. They need not report in office and can flexibly work from home at their own timings. At the same time saving their sick leaves.
Engagement
Remote workers are not in a hurry to log off as they don’t need to catch a bus or cab waiting for them to leave. Remote workers have reported 32% more engagement than employees working in the office. 46% primarily communicate with coworkers through email, IM or phone to avoid the distractions of face-to-face interactions. Remote workers are good in collaboration and perform better engagement than in-house employees.
Satisfaction with Job
According to research, 64% of people are ready to compromise with their salary for working from home. Employees are more satisfied working from their places they get the privileges of enjoying the home benefits with work. They can have a balanced work and personal life. Also, no need to commute in these busy roads and lanes which gives much healthy environment.
Cost-Effectiveness
It has been reported that employers working from home saves a lot of bucks working from home. Not the employees only, even the employers save huge amount of bucks if they hire remote resources. According to a Cisco study, the company saved $277 million per year from telecommuting employees. Another factor from the employer’s point of view is that the employers take leave during bad weather or sick condition which induces them huge loss but on the other hand, remote workers can work in bad weather and sick condition from home.
Back To You:
Can you think of more reasons how remote employees are more productive than in-house employees? Become a part of this debate by commenting on the comment section below.
Sales-Push.com
